I love Faulkner's descriptions. he writes so beautifully, almost suspenseful as well.
My favorite was the very last paragraph of the piece.
"He went on through the house, ripping off his shirt, and on the dark, screened porch at the rear he stood and mopped his head and shoulders with the shirt and flung it away. He took the pistol from his hip and laid it on the table beside the bed, and sat on the bed and removed his shoes, and rose and slipped his trousers off. He was sweating again already, and he stooped and hunted furiously for the shirt. At last he found it and wiped his body again, and, with his body pressed against the dusty screen, he stood panting. There was no movement, no sound, not even an insect. The dark world seemed to lie stricken beneath the cold moon and the lidless stars."
There is incredible imagery here, you can feel the sleaze from McLendon's character. Even words like "mopped" indicates the cleaning of a mess, because that what we use mops for. He is using the shirt he was just wearing, as a mop, to clean is body. Words like "hunted" show
McLendon's nature. He is not a gentle man, he is clearly angry and instinctual. After he has just wiped his body, "he pressed his body against the dusty screen." Cleanliness is obviously not important to him. Why not have the character take a shower if he is sweating? Having McLendon take a shower instead wouldn't show the sleazy nature of this character. "He stood panting." Faulkner has just used words like "hunted" and "panting" this adds to McLendon's animalistic nature. The last sentence is just so eery, it leaves the reader fearing for his wife, who doesn't seem to have been given a name.
I like your character analysis of McLendon. Faulkner does reveal his nature through his physical actions, rather than telling us. Minnie is much more narrated for us. I think the physical actions that stand for McLendon's character feel less manipulated and more natural, emphasizing his animalness.
ReplyDeleteHemingway is kind of the opposite style. Rather than letting the actions of his characters reveal them, he reveals their inner nature through their apparently simple dialogue.